Editorial policy
Useful first. Transparent always.
Our goal is not to publish the largest list. It is to help a developer make a better decision with enough context to understand usefulness, limitations, and risk.
Independence and sources
We link to original sources and distinguish official, community, and demo entries. We do not rewrite a source into a recommendation without adding our own context.
AI-assisted production
AI may assist with research and drafting. Editors are responsible for factual review, risk interpretation, status labels, and publication decisions. We do not claim that AI-generated text is independently verified by default.
Corrections and updates
When a source changes, a link breaks, a license changes, or a security concern becomes known, we update the entry or downgrade its status. Unverified information is labeled rather than silently presented as fact.
Commercial transparency
If sponsorships, affiliate relationships, or featured placements are introduced, they will be labeled separately from editorial recommendations and will not override safety or source requirements.
Corrections
If you find an inaccurate entry, outdated source, or misleading status label, please report it privately to the project maintainer with the relevant URL and evidence.